Testing in Dotty
Running all tests in Dotty is as simple as:
$ sbt test
There are currently several forms of tests in Dotty. These can be split into two categories:
Unit tests
These tests can be found in <sub-project>/test
and are used to check
functionality of specific parts of the codebase in isolation e.g: parsing,
scanning and message errors.
To run all tests in e.g., for the compiler test-suite you can write:
$ sbt
> dotty-compiler/test
To run a single test class you use testOnly
and the fully qualified class name.
For example:
> testOnly dotty.tools.dotc.transform.TreeTransformerTest
The test command follows a regular expression-based syntax testOnly * -- *
.
The right-hand side picks a range of names for methods and the left-hand side picks a range of class names and their
fully-qualified paths.
Consequently, you can restrict the aforementioned executed test to a subset of methods by appending -- *method_name
.
The example below picks up all methods with the name canOverwrite
:
> testOnly dotty.tools.dotc.transform.TreeTransformerTest -- *canOverwrite
Additionally, you can run all tests named method_name
, in any class, without providing a class name:
> testOnly -- *canOverwrite
You can also run all paths of classes of a certain name:
> testOnly *.TreeTransformerTest
Testing with checkfiles
Some tests support checking the output of the run or the compilation against a checkfile. A checkfile is a file in which the expected output of the compilation or run is defined. A test against a checkfile fails if the actual output mismatches the expected output.
Currently, the run
and neg
(compilation must fail for the test to succeed) tests support the checkfiles. run
's checkfiles contain an expected run output of the successfully compiled program. neg
's checkfiles contain an expected error output during compilation.
Absence of a checkfile is not a condition for the test failure. E.g. if a neg
test fails with the expected number of errors and there is no checkfile for it, the test still passes.
Checkfiles are located in the same directories as the tests they check, have the same name as these tests with the extension *.check
. E.g. if you have a test named tests/neg/foo.scala
, you can create a checkfile for it named tests/neg/foo.check
. And if you have a test composed of several files in a single directory, e.g. tests/neg/manyScalaFiles
, the checkfile will be tests/neg/manyScalaFiles.check
.
If the actual output mismatches the expected output, the test framework will dump the actual output in the file *.check.out
and fail the test suite. It will also output the instructions to quickly replace the expected output with the actual output, in the following format:
Test output dumped in: tests/playground/neg/Sample.check.out
See diff of the checkfile
> diff tests/playground/neg/Sample.check tests/playground/neg/Sample.check.out
Replace checkfile with current output
> mv tests/playground/neg/Sample.check.out tests/playground/neg/Sample.check
To create a checkfile for a test, you can do one of the following:
- Create a dummy checkfile with a random content, run the test, and, when it fails, use the
mv
command reported by the test to replace the dummy checkfile with the actual output. - Manually compile the file you are testing with
dotc
and copy-paste whatever console output the compiler produces to the checkfile.
Integration tests
These tests are Scala source files expected to compile with Dotty (pos tests), along with their expected output (run tests) or errors (neg tests).
All of these tests are contained in the ./tests/*
directories and can be run with the testCompilation
command. Tests in folders named with-compiler
are an exception, see next section.
Currently to run these tests you need to invoke from sbt:
$ sbt
> testCompilation
(which is effectively the same with testOnly dotty.tools.dotc.CompilationTests
)
It is also possible to run tests filtered, again from sbt:
$ sbt
> testCompilation companions
This will run both the test ./tests/pos/companions.scala
and
./tests/neg/companions.scala
since both of these match the given string.
This also means that you could run testCompilation
with no arguments to run all integration tests.
When complex checkfiles must be updated, testCompilation
can run in a mode where it overrides the checkfiles with the test outputs.
$ sbt
> testCompilation --update-checkfiles
Use --help
to see all the options
$ sbt
> testCompilation --help
Bootstrapped-only tests
To run testCompilation
on a bootstrapped Dotty compiler, use
dotty-compiler-bootstrapped/testCompilation
(with the same syntax as above).
Some tests can only be run in bootstrapped compilers; that includes all tests
with with-compiler
in their name.
From TASTy tests
testCompilation
has an additional mode to run tests that compile code from a .tasty
file.
Modify blacklist and whitelists in compiler/test/dotc
to enable or disable tests from .tasty
files.
$ sbt
> testCompilation --from-tasty
This mode can be run under dotty-compiler-bootstrapped/testCompilation
to test on a bootstrapped Dotty compiler.
SemanticDB tests
The output of the extractSemanticDB
phase, enabled with -Ysemanticdb
is tested with the bootstrapped JUnit test
dotty.tools.dotc.semanticdb.SemanticdbTests
. It uses source files in tests/semanticdb/expect
to generate
two kinds of output file that are compared with "expect files": placement of semanticdb symbol occurrences inline in
sourcecode (*.expect.scala
), for human verification by inspection; and secondly metap formatted output which outputs
all information stored in semanticdb (metac.expect
).
Expect files are used as regression tests to detect changes in the compiler.
The test suite will create a new file if it detects any difference, which can be compared with the
original expect file, or if the user wants to globally replace all expect files for semanticdb they can use
dotty-compiler-bootstrapped/test:runMain dotty.tools.dotc.semanticdb.updateExpect
, and compare the changes via version
control.