Dotty Internals 1: Trees & Symbols (Meeting Notes)
These are meeting notes for the Dotty Internals 1: Trees & Symbols talk by Dmitry Petrashko on Mar 21, 2017.
Entry point
dotc/Compiler.scala
The entry point to the compiler contains the list of phases and their order.
Phases
Some phases executed independently, but others (miniphases) are grouped for efficiency. See the paper "Miniphases: Compilation using Modular and Efficient Tree Transformation" for details.
Trees
dotc/ast/Trees.scala
Trees represent code written by the user (e.g. methods, classes, expressions). There are two kinds of trees: untyped and typed.
Unlike other compilers (but like scalac), dotty doesn't use multiple intermediate representations (IRs) during the compilation pipeline. Instead, it uses trees for all phases.
Dotty trees are immutable, so they can be shared.
Untyped trees
dotc/ast/untpd.scala
These are the trees as output by the parser.
Some trees only exist as untyped: e.g. WhileDo and ForDo. These are desugared by the typechecker.
Typed trees
dotc/ast/tpd.scala
Typed trees contain not only the user-written code, but also semantic information (the types) about the code.
Notes on some tree types
RefTree: trees that refer to something. There are multiple subtypesIdent: by-name referenceSelect: select (e.g. a field) from another tree (e.g.a.foois represented asSelect(Ident(a), foo))
This: the this pointerApply: function application: e.g.a.foo(1, 2)(3, 4)becomesApply(Apply(Select(Ident(a), foo), List(1, 2)), List(3, 4))TypeApply: type application:def foo[T](a: T) = ??? foo[Int](1)becomesApply(TypeApply(Ident(foo), List(Int)), List(1))Literal: constants (e.g. integer constant 1)Typed: type ascription (e.g. for widening, as in(1: Any))NamedArg: named arguments (can appear out-of-order in untyped trees, but will appear in-order in typed ones)Assign: assignment. The node has alhsand arhs, but thelhscan be arbitrarily complicated (e.g.(new C).f = 0).If: the condition in an if-expression can be arbitrarily complex (e.g. it can contain class definitions)Closure: the free variables are stored in theenvfield, but are only accessible "around" theLambdaLiftphase.MatchandCaseDef: pattern-matching trees. Thepatfield inCaseDef(the pattern) is, in turn, populated with a subset of trees likeBindandUnapply.Return: return from a method. If thefromfield is empty, then we return from the closest enclosing method. Theexprfield should have a types that matches the return type of the method, but theReturnnode itself has type bottom.TypeTree: tree representing a type (e.g. forTypeApply).AndType,OrType, etc.: these are other trees that represent types that can be written by the user. These are a strict subset of all types, since some types cannot be written by the user.ValDef: defines fields or local variables. To differentiate between the two cases, we can look at the denotation. ThepreRhsfield is lazy because sometimes we want to "load" a definition without know what's on the rhs (for example, to look up its type).DefDef: method definition.TypeDef: type definition. Bothtype A = ???andclass A {}are represented with aTypeDef. To differentiate between the two, look at the type of the node (better), or in the case of classes there should be aTemplatenode in the rhs.Template: describes the "body" of a class, including inheritance information and constructor. Theconstrfield will be populated only after theConstructorsphase; before that the constructor lives in thepreBodyfield.Thicket: allows us to return multiple trees when a single one is expected. This kind of tree is not user-visible. For example,transformDefDefinLabelDefstakes in aDefDefand needs to be able to sometimes break up the method into multiple methods, which are then returned as a single tree (via aThicket). If we return a thicket in a location where multiple trees are expected, the compiler will flatten them, but if only one tree is expected (for example, in the constructor field of a class), then the compiler will throw.
ThisTree
Tree classes have a ThisTree type field which is used to implement functionality that's common for all trees while returning a specific tree type. See withType in the Tree base class, for an example.
Additionally, both Tree and ThisTree are polymorphic so they can represent both untyped and typed trees.
For example, withType has signature def withType(tpe: Type)(implicit ctx: Context): ThisTree[Type]. This means that withType can return the most-specific tree type for the current tree, while at the same time guaranteeing that the returned tree will be typed.
Creating trees
You should use the creation methods in untpd.scala and tpd.scala to instantiate tree objects (as opposed to creating them directly using the case classes in Trees.scala).
Meaning of trees
In general, the best way to know what a tree represents is to look at its type or denotation; pattern matching on the structure of a tree is error-prone.
Errors
dotc/typer/ErrorReporting.scala
Sometimes there's an error during compilation, but we want to continue compilling (as opposed to failing outright), to uncover additional errors.
In cases where a tree is expected but there's an error, we can use the errorTree methods in ErrorReporting to create placeholder trees that explicitly mark the presence of errors.
Similarly, there exist ErrorType and ErrorSymbol classes.
Assignment
The closest in Dotty to what a programming language like C calls an "l-value" is a RefTree (so an Ident or a Select). However, keep in mind that arbitrarily complex expressions can appear in the lhs of an assignment: e.g.
trait T {
var s = 0
}
{
class T2 extends T
while (true) 1
new Bla
}.s = 10
Another caveat, before typechecking there can be some trees where the lhs isn't a RefTree: e.g. (a, b) = (3, 4).
Symbols
dotc/core/Symbols.scala
Symbols are references to definitions (e.g. of variables, fields, classes). Symbols can be used to refer to definitions for which we don't have ASTs (for example, from the Java standard library).
NoSymbol is used to indicate the lack of a symbol.
Symbols uniquely identify definitions, but they don't say what the definitions mean. To understand the meaning of a symbol we need to look at its denotation (spefically for symbols, a SymDenotation).
Symbols can not only represent terms, but also types (hence the isTerm/isType methods in the Symbol class).
ClassSymbol
ClassSymbol represents either a class, or an trait, or an object. For example, an object
object O {
val s = 1
}
is represented (after Typer) as
class O$ { this: O.type =>
val s = 1
}
val O = new O$
where we have a type symbol for class O$ and a term symbol for val O. Notice the use of the selftype O.type to indicate that this has a singleton type.
SymDenotation
dotc/core/SymDenotations.scala
Symbols contain SymDenotations. The denotation, in turn, refers to:
- the source symbol (so the linkage is cyclic)
- the "owner" of the symbol:
- if the symbol is a variable, the owner is the enclosing method
- if it's a field, the owner is the enclosing class
- if it's a class, then the owner is the enclosing class
- a set of flags that contain semantic information about the definition (e.g. whether it's a trait or mutable). Flags are defined in
Flags.scala. - the type of the definition (through the
infomethod)